Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Vincent STARNELLA, etc., appellant, v. Burke HEAT, et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Navigation Law § 181 to recover damages resulting from the discharge of petroleum the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered August 12, 2003, which denied his motion for an award of an attorney's fee.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to determine the amount of the attorney's fee to which the plaintiff is entitled.
The court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion for an award of an attorney's fee incurred in this action to recover damages pursuant to Navigation Law § 181 resulting from the discharge of petroleum. There is no requirement that to bring an action pursuant to Navigation Law § 181(5), or to recover an attorney's fee thereunder, a plaintiff must have either paid cleanup and removal costs or been held liable to the State for cleanup and removal costs (see AMCO Intl. v. Long Island R.R. Co., 302 A.D.2d 338, 754 N.Y.S.2d 655; cf. State of New York v. Tartan Oil Corp., 219 A.D.2d 111, 638 N.Y.S.2d 989). The statute provides a private right of action against a discharger to recover direct and indirect damages, in addition to damages relating to the cleanup and removal of oil (see Navigation Law § 181[1]; [2]; [5]; Putnam v. State of New York, 223 A.D.2d 872, 636 N.Y.S.2d 473). Indirect damages include an attorney's fee incurred by a property owner against the discharger in such an action (see AMCO Intl. v. Long Is. R.R. Co., supra; Strand v. Neglia, 232 A.D.2d 907, 909, 649 N.Y.S.2d 729).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 31, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)