Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Josephine SMITH, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. SOUTH BROOKHAVEN HEALTH CENTER, et al., Defendants, Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Appellant.
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the Suffolk County Department of Social Services appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated June 21, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs' motion to vacate a lien in the amount of $27,502.25, imposed pursuant to Social Services Law § 104-b, against the proceeds of a settlement between the plaintiffs and the defendants.
ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision which granted the plaintiffs' motion to vacate a lien in the amount of $27,502.25, imposed pursuant to Social Services Law § 104-b, against the proceeds of a settlement between the plaintiffs and the defendants, and substituting therefor a provision denying the plaintiffs' motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Suffolk County Department of Social Services (hereinafter the DSS) contends that it can recover the cost of medical assistance rendered to the infant Robert Smith prior to his 21st birthday from that portion of the settlement allocated to his mother's cause of action. We will consider this issue even though it is raised for the first time on appeal, because it concerns an issue of law apparent on the face of the record which could not have been avoided by the opposing parties if brought to their attention at the proper juncture (see, Vilardi v. Berley, 201 A.D.2d 641, 643, 608 N.Y.S.2d 243; Libeson v. Copy Realty Corp., 167 A.D.2d 376, 561 N.Y.S.2d 604; Block v. Magee, 146 A.D.2d 730, 537 N.Y.S.2d 215). We agree with the DSS that because Josephine Smith was responsible for her son's support until he reached the age of 21 (see, Family Ct. Act § 415; Social Services Law § 101), it may recover the cost of medical assistance rendered to Robert from that portion of the settlement allocated to his mother on her cause of action (see, Sizemore v. Heavy Transp., 199 A.D.2d 969, 607 N.Y.S.2d 509; Mendelson v. Transport of N.J., 113 A.D.2d 202, 495 N.Y.S.2d 973).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 08, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)