Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Lumumba WOODS, Petitioner, v. Lucien LeCLAIRE, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting the assault of another inmate and fighting. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the assault charge and not guilty of the fighting charge. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. To the extent that the petition can be construed as raising a substantial evidence question, we note that the misbehavior report, together with the testimony given by the authoring correction officer both at the hearing and confidentially, comprise the requisite substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Matias v. Selsky, 43 A.D.3d 1261, 1262, 842 N.Y.S.2d 115 [2007] ). Regarding petitioner's assertion that he was denied the right to present testimony from the inmate he was found guilty of assaulting and the facility nurse who examined that inmate, such a claim is unpreserved for our review by virtue of petitioner's failure to lodge the appropriate objections at the hearing (see Matter of Towles v. Selsky, 12 A.D.3d 737, 738, 783 N.Y.S.2d 431 [2004], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 706, 794 N.Y.S.2d 300, 827 N.E.2d 284 [2005] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 11, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)