PEOPLE v. BROWN (1997)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Trysone BROWN, Appellant.

Decided: August 18, 1997

Before MANGANO, P.J., and RITTER, SULLIVAN, ALTMAN and McGINITY, JJ.

Daniel L. Greenberg, New York City (Carlos G. Manalansan, of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (John M. Castellano and Nicole Beder, of counsel; Sheryl L. Arshadnia, on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered December 27, 1995, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the trial court should have granted his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because it failed to inform him that he faced increased punishment and would not be allowed to withdraw his plea if he was rearrested pending sentence is not preserved for appellate review, as the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground (see, People v. Mackey, 77 N.Y.2d 846, 567 N.Y.S.2d 639, 569 N.E.2d 442; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Granton, 236 A.D.2d 624, 655 N.Y.S.2d 49; People v. Mesquite, 234 A.D.2d 395, 651 N.Y.S.2d 546). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (see, People v. Patterson, 227 A.D.2d 572, 643 N.Y.S.2d 171).

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network