Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Theresa TURSO, et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. Carolee SUNDERLAND, et al., etc., Respondents, Gary M. Stracuzzi, et al., Appellants.
In a proceeding to invalidate a certificate of authorization designating Gary M. Stracuzzi as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 1997, for the nomination of the Conservative Party as its candidate for the public office of Westchester County Legislator, Sixth County Legislative District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated August 13, 1997, which, inter alia, granted the application.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly determined that a so-called “Wilson-Pakula” certificate of authorization had to be filed with the Board of Elections in order for the Westchester County Conservative Party (hereinafter the party) to properly designate the appellant Gary M. Stracuzzi as its candidate for the public office of Westchester County Legislator for the Sixth Legislative District (see, Election Law § 6-120[3] ). Pursuant to the party's bylaws, only the Executive or Governing Committees had the authority to issue the certificate of authorization. Because the stipulation entered into by the parties in open court indicated that neither committee was convened to consider Stracuzzi's designation, the certificate of authorization contained in the record could not have been issued by a duly authorized committee of the party as required by the party's bylaws and, therefore, is invalid. Accordingly, the application was properly granted.
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)