Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Maria M. KANTHA, Appellant, et al., Petitioners, v. Carmen R. SCAGLIONE, Respondent-Respondent, et al., Respondent.
In three related proceedings to invalidate petitions designating Carmen R. Scaglione as a candidate of the Republican, Conservative, and Independence Parties in the primary elections to be held on September 9, 1997, for the public office of Member of the Westchester County Legislature, 5th Legislative District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered August 7, 1997, which dismissed the proceedings.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petitions are granted, and the Westchester County Board of Elections is directed to remove the name of Carmen R. Scaglione from the appropriate ballots.
The appellant, a candidate for the Office of Member of the Westchester County Legislature, 5th Legislative District, was an aggrieved candidate and was therefore not required to file objections pursuant to Election Law § 6-154 in order to commence these proceedings challenging three separate designating petitions (see, Election Law § 16-102; Matter of Liepshutz v. Palmateer, 65 N.Y.2d 963, 494 N.Y.S.2d 108, 484 N.E.2d 137; Scoville v. Cicoria, 65 N.Y.2d 972, 494 N.Y.S.2d 91, 484 N.E.2d 120; Matter of Parker v. Savago, 143 A.D.2d 439, 440-441, 532 N.Y.S.2d 438; Matter of Martin v. Tutunjian, 89 A.D.2d 1034, 454 N.Y.S.2d 343).
Further, the appellant has sufficiently shown that Carmen R. Scaglione participated in fraudulent conduct to warrant removing her from the ballots (see, Matter of Bynoe v. Board of Elections of the City of New York, 164 A.D.2d 929, 559 N.Y.S.2d 588; Matter of MacDougall v. Board of Elections, 133 A.D.2d 198, 518 N.Y.S.2d 840; Matter of Layden v. Gargiulo, 77 A.D.2d 933, 431 N.Y.S.2d 118).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: August 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)