Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jose O. HERNANDEZ, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), rendered April 1, 1996, convicting him of attempted rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By decision and order dated May 11, 1998, this court affirmed the judgment (People v. Hernandez, 250 A.D.2d 704, 673 N.Y.S.2d 169). By opinion and order dated May 6, 1999, the Court of Appeals modified the decision and order of this court and remitted the matter to this court for consideration of the defendant's constitutional challenge to his certification as a sex offender pursuant to Correction Law § 168-d(1) and, as so modified, affirmed the decision and order of this court (People v. Hernandez, 93 N.Y.2d 261, 689 N.Y.S.2d 695, 711 N.E.2d 972).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his certification as a sex offender by the sentencing court pursuant to Correction Law § 168-d(1) violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws, since he committed the subject offenses on or about February 13, 1995, and New York's Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see, Correction Law § 168 et seq.) did not take effect until January 21, 1996. The contention is unpersuasive. This court and a number of other courts have already upheld the constitutionality of the retroactive application of the provisions of SORA to individuals convicted of sex offenses before its effective date in the face of ex post facto challenges (see, Doe v. Pataki, 2d Cir., 120 F.3d 1263, cert. denied 522 U.S. 1122, 118 S.Ct. 1066, 140 L.Ed.2d 126; People v. Langdon, 258 A.D.2d 937, 685 N.Y.S.2d 877; People v. Grice, 254 A.D.2d 710, 679 N.Y.S.2d 771; Matter of S.V. v. Calabrese, 246 A.D.2d 655, 668 N.Y.S.2d 53; Matter of M.G. v. Travis, 236 A.D.2d 163, 667 N.Y.S.2d 11).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 20, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)