Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas R. SNOW, a Suspended Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Thomas R. Snow, Respondent.
Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of six months by this court (253 A.D.2d 980, 677 N.Y.S.2d 829). He now applies for reinstatement.
We conclude that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order which suspended him and with the provisions of this court's rule governing the conduct of suspended attorneys (22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that he possesses the requisite character and fitness to resume the practice of law and that he has complied with the requirements of this court's rule regulating reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12), except for that provision requiring him to show that he has taken and attained a passing score on the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (22 NYCRR 806.12[b], [ii] ).
Mindful of respondent's disciplinary history, we impose conditions on his reinstatement as recommended by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards. Respondent shall restrict his practice of law to employment as an attorney for the State of New York until further order of the court. He shall submit copies of his future biennial registration statements to petitioner. Finally, he is directed to comply with the provision of our rules requiring an applicant for reinstatement to demonstrate the taking and passing of the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12[b] ). Respondent shall report his compliance with this requirement to petitioner on or before December 31, 1999.
ORDERED that respondent's application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, upon the conditions and directions set forth in the decision herein, effective immediately.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 21, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)