Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Shawn GREEN, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Unit Inmate Discipline for the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assault on a staff member, violent conduct, refusal to follow frisk procedures and refusing to obey direct orders. Evidence presented at petitioner's disciplinary hearing disclosed that he was the subject of two misbehavior reports, both arising out of the same incident. They stated that petitioner had been one of several inmates confined to the special housing unit when, in the course of a recreational period in the prison yard, a fight broke out between inmates. After the fight had been broken up by correction officers, all inmates present were directed to submit to a pat frisk. Petitioner refused several times, first in the prison yard and subsequently after confinement in his cell. When the demands of correction officers to submit to a pat frisk were repeated, petitioner lunged from his cell, cursing the correction officers and striking one of them in the face.
The two misbehavior reports together with the testimony of the three correction officers and two inmates who were eyewitnesses to the misconduct in question were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of Green v. Coombe, 233 A.D.2d 659, 649 N.Y.S.2d 829, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 808, 655 N.Y.S.2d 888, 678 N.E.2d 501). Petitioner's remaining assertions of procedural irregularities and errors have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
PETERS, J.
MIKOLL, J.P., CREW III, YESAWICH JR. and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)