Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Patrick TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Unit, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit assault on an inmate, possession of a weapon and refusing to obey a direct order. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the last charge and was found guilty following an administrative hearing of the remaining charges. Subsequently, the finding that petitioner was guilty of possession of a weapon was administratively reversed. Petitioner contends in this proceeding that he was denied the right to a fair and impartial hearing. We disagree.
Although the Hearing Officer remarked on more than one occasion that he did not believe petitioner and thought that he was lying, we do not find that such comments conclusively establish bias (see, Matter of Barnhill v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 719, 721, 657 N.Y.S.2d 492, 493). The Hearing Officer was vested with the authority to resolve questions of credibility and to reject petitioner's testimony (see, Matter of Nelson v. Selsky, 239 A.D.2d 795, 658 N.Y.S.2d 486, 487). Furthermore, petitioner was permitted to testify regarding his version of the events and to present a defense. We conclude that petitioner has failed to establish that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Barnhill v. Coombe, supra ). Petitioner's remaining contentions are found to be without merit or unpreserved for our review.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 04, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)