Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Allen MORRIS, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons after a search of his cell uncovered a sharpened steel rod in a sneaker under his bed. We reject petitioner's assertion that the misbehavior report contained inadequate detail to provide him with notice of charge against him because it did not specify exactly where the weapon was found (see generally, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 123, 623 N.Y.S.2d 758, 647 N.E.2d 1266). In any event, petitioner testified that he had been informed at the time he was frisked following the discovery of the weapon that it was located in his sneaker.
While petitioner asserts that other inmates had access to the area where the weapon was found, this is insufficient to negate the inference of petitioner's possession given the misbehavior report and testimony presented at the hearing, including that of the correction officer who found the weapon in petitioner's sneaker under his bed, and the inferences to be drawn therefrom. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Kennedy v. Coombe, 236 A.D.2d 726, 654 N.Y.S.2d 422; Matter of Clark v. Coughlin, 206 A.D.2d 567, 614 N.Y.S.2d 75). Petitioner's claim that the shank was planted merely presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Mendez v. Jones, 176 A.D.2d 423, 574 N.Y.S.2d 412). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)