Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jeffrey SKYA, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (La Pera, J.), rendered May 20, 2005, convicting him of disseminating indecent material to minors in the first degree and attempted disseminating indecent material to minors in the first degree (four counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The insufficiency of factual allegations in an indictment is a nonjurisdictional defect (see Matter of Taub v. Altman, 3 N.Y.3d 30, 40 n. 8, 781 N.Y.S.2d 492, 814 N.E.2d 799; People v. Iannone, 45 N.Y.2d 589, 600-601, 412 N.Y.S.2d 110, 384 N.E.2d 656; People v. George, 261 A.D.2d 711, 713, 694 N.Y.S.2d 478), and claims made in the trial level courts regarding nonjurisdictional defects in a jurisdictionally-sufficient accusatory instrument are forfeited by a defendant's plea of guilty (see People v. Taylor, 65 N.Y.2d 1, 5, 489 N.Y.S.2d 152, 478 N.E.2d 755; cf. People v. Parilla, 8 N.Y.3d 654, 659, 838 N.Y.S.2d 824, 870 N.E.2d 142). By pleading guilty, the defendant has forfeited his claim that the indictment did not sufficiently allege facts constituting the charged crimes (see People v. Taylor, 65 N.Y.2d 1, 5, 489 N.Y.S.2d 152, 478 N.E.2d 755).
Additionally, by pleading guilty, the defendant has forfeited his claim that his conduct did not satisfy the elements of the offense charged in the first four counts of the indictment (see People v. Shearer, 29 A.D.3d 608, 609, 813 N.Y.S.2d 308). The defendant does not make a similar claim with respect to the fifth count.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 25, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)