Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Daniel SILVESTRI, etc., respondent, v. Samuel IANNONE, appellant.
In an action brought by motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint to recover on a promissory note, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated April 27, 1998, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is denied.
The plaintiff made a prima facie showing that he was entitled to summary judgment by submitting proof of a promissory note signed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff's testator in the amount of $50,000. In order to avoid summary judgment the defendant was required to “show facts sufficient to require a trial of any issue of fact” (CPLR 3212[b]; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718). The defendant alleges that he repaid the loan during the testator's lifetime in monthly installments and that the testator kept written records of those payments. Even though the defendant's testimony would be excluded at trial upon objection under the Dead Man's Statute (CPLR 4519), such proof may be considered in opposition to a motion for summary judgment (see, Phillips v. Kantor & Co., 31 N.Y.2d 307, 338 N.Y.S.2d 882, 291 N.E.2d 129; Tancredi v. Mannino, 75 A.D.2d 579, 426 N.Y.S.2d 577; Guzman v. Strab Constr. Corp., 228 A.D.2d 645, 645 N.Y.S.2d 318; Zuilkowski v. Sentry Ins., 114 A.D.2d 453, 454, 494 N.Y.S.2d 363; McEvoy v. Garcia, 114 A.D.2d 401, 494 N.Y.S.2d 125; Stone v. Stone, 76 A.D.2d 833, 428 N.Y.S.2d 487). Invocation of the Dead Man's Statute is expressly limited by statute to “the trial of an action or the hearing upon the merits of a special proceeding” (CPLR 4519), since further evidence may be revealed prior to trial through disclosure or otherwise and the statutory objection may be waived (see, Phillips v. Kantor & Co., supra). Thus, the motion for summary judgment should have been denied (see, Tancredi v. Mannino, 75 A.D.2d 579, 426 N.Y.S.2d 577).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)