Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Shawn THOMAS, Petitioner, v. Thomas RICKS, as Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from participation in unauthorized organizational activity. As set forth in the misbehavior report, two correction officers were moving petitioner's cellmate to another cell when petitioner began chanting from the recreation pen, “Blood up! Blood up! Blood up!” The officers recognized this as a chant used by members of an unauthorized prison gang known as the “Bloods”. At the disciplinary hearing, the misbehavior report was admitted in evidence as was a videotape from the surveillance camera positioned outside petitioner's cell. The chanted words can be heard on the tape although their source cannot be determined. The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that he had not only heard the words in question, but had observed petitioner saying them. A second correction officer testified that he had received training in unauthorized inmate activities such as prison gangs and he recognized the words as a chant used as a signal by members of the Bloods.
The proof submitted at the hearing was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Marcus v. Goord, 287 A.D.2d 906, 731 N.Y.S.2d 559; Matter of Cornwall v. Goord, 284 A.D.2d 763, 764, 725 N.Y.S.2d 765). Although petitioner's former cellmate testified that petitioner had remained silent while the chant was uttered by a neighboring inmate, this presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Allah v. Selsky, 265 A.D.2d 824, 695 N.Y.S.2d 816; Matter of Devodier v. Selsky, 241 A.D.2d 737, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1017). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 17, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)