Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas MEALER, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of New York State Department of Correctional Services Special Housing Unit & Inmate Disciplinary Program, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of engaging in a sexual act and violating facility visiting procedures. The misbehavior report relates that petitioner was observed fondling his wife's breast during a facility visit, despite having been warned about excessive physical contact on several prior occasions. Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Murray v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 794, 694 N.Y.S.2d 797; Matter of Garcia v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 674, 690 N.Y.S.2d 169, lv. dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 834, 703 N.Y.S.2d 66, 724 N.E.2d 761). Likewise, we reject petitioner's assertion that the penalty of 60 days' suspension of contact visitation was excessive (see, 7 NYCRR 200.5[f] ). Petitioner's remaining arguments were not raised at the hearing and, thus, have not been preserved for our review (see, Matter of Stile v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 693, 727 N.Y.S.2d 736).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 17, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)