Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: IMPERIAL IMPROVEMENTS, LLC, Appellant, v. TOWN OF WAPPINGER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, et al., Respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Planning Board of the Town of Wappinger dated April 17, 2000, which granted conditional site plan approval for the construction of a supermarket, and a determination of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals dated May 9, 2000, which granted area variances for the same project, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated September 11, 2000, as dismissed the petition.
Motion by the respondent Martin's Foods of South Burlington, Inc., to dismiss the appeal as academic.
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner failed to move in the Supreme Court for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the construction of the subject supermarket. In addition, the petitioner failed to move in this court for a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo pending the determination of this appeal. Thus, the petitioner failed to preserve its rights pending judicial review and the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see, Matter of Gorman v. Town Bd. of Town of E. Hampton, 273 A.D.2d 235, 709 N.Y.S.2d 433; see also, Matter of Center Sq. Assn. v. Board of Bldg., Zoning and Hous. Appeals of City of Albany, 195 A.D.2d 684, 599 N.Y.S.2d 897). The subject project is substantially complete. If the petitioner prevailed under these circumstances, the prejudice to the respondent Martin's Foods of South Burlington, Inc., would be substantial (cf., Michalak v. ZBA of Town of Pomfret, 286 A.D.2d 906, 731 N.Y.S.2d 129).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 22, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)