Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert FELLER, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene County (Lalor, J.), rendered December 9, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree and of violating the terms of his probation.
While on probation, defendant was charged by indictment with assault in the first degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree and violation of probation and waived his right to appeal. Defendant thereafter was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years on the probation violation and five years on the assault conviction. Defendant now appeals.
Defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution is foreclosed by his voluntary waiver of the right to appeal, and is unpreserved due to his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Tausinger, 21 A.D.3d 1181, 1182, 801 N.Y.S.2d 106 [2005]; People v. Briggs, 21 A.D.3d 652, 653, 799 N.Y.S.2d 664 [2005]; People v. Wehrle, 308 A.D.2d 660, 661, 764 N.Y.S.2d 668 [2003] ). Moreover, defendant's statements during the plea colloquy did not negate an essential element of the crime or cast significant doubt upon his guilt so as to trigger the exception to the preservation requirement (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 [1988]; People v. Reid, 21 A.D.3d 1215, 1216, 801 N.Y.S.2d 437 [2005]; People v. Bethea, 19 A.D.3d 813, 814, 797 N.Y.S.2d 158 [2005] ). Finally, given defendant's knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review his contention that the sentence should be reduced in the interest of justice (see People v. Clow, 10 A.D.3d 803, 804, 782 N.Y.S.2d 148 [2004] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
CREW III, J.
CARDONA, P.J., PETERS, SPAIN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 12, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)