Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph MARIANI, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After a can top and a container of black pepper were found in his cube, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of a weapon and possession of contraband. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing he was found guilty of these charges. That determination was confirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report, together with petitioner's admissions that the items in question were in his cube (see Matter of Amaker v. Selsky, 42 A.D.3d 827, 827, 838 N.Y.S.2d 921 [2007]; Matter of Barham v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 607, 608, 838 N.Y.S.2d 273 [2007] ). Petitioner's assertion that he cannot be guilty of the weapon possession charge because he never intended to use the can top as a weapon is unavailing (see Matter of Victory v. Coughlin, 143 A.D.2d 455, 457, 532 N.Y.S.2d 451 [1988] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly denied the right to present witness testimony and the Hearing Officer was not appropriately designated to conduct the hearing, are unpreserved for our review.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)