Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jose DIAZ, Petitioner, v. James T. SMITH, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
During a confidential investigation, an inmate disclosed that petitioner had given him marihuana in exchange for cigarettes and had threatened him when he was unable to pay off the remainder of the debt that he owed to petitioner. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats and possessing a controlled substance. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Initially, we find no merit to petitioner's claim that the proper hearing transcript has not been provided for this Court's review inasmuch as this defect was remedied by respondents' supplementation of the record with the correct transcript. Turning to the merits, the misbehavior report, hearing testimony and confidential information considered by the Hearing Officer in camera provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Vassell v. Fischer, 48 A.D.3d 876, 849 N.Y.S.2d 915 [2008]; Matter of Jackson v. McGinnis, 47 A.D.3d 1100, 1101, 848 N.Y.S.2d 903 [2008] ). Petitioner's denial of any wrongdoing presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Sweet v. Poole, 48 A.D.3d 867, 867-868, 850 N.Y.S.2d 721 [2008]; Matter of Garner v. Selsky, 47 A.D.3d 1167, 849 N.Y.S.2d 456 [2008] ). Therefore, we decline to disturb the determination of guilt.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 11, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)