Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald J. LATHAM, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Stein, J.), entered December 19, 2007 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.
In 1995, petitioner was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree and attempted murder in the second degree and was sentenced, respectively, to concurrent prison terms of 8 1/313 to 25 years and 7 1/212 to 22 1/212 years. In September 2006, he made his sixth appearance before the Board of Parole seeking parole release. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board denied his request and ordered him held for an additional 24 months. Petitioner filed an administrative appeal and then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of his request for parole. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.
Since the commencement of the instant proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board and his request for release on parole was once again denied. In view of this, the appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Rivers v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 34 A.D.3d 954, 822 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2006]; Matter of Blasich v. Dennison, 29 A.D.3d 1189, 1190, 813 N.Y.S.2d 923 [2006] ). Contrary to petitioner's claim, we do not find that the matter at hand presents an exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Malangone v. Dennison, 46 A.D.3d 1155, 847 N.Y.S.2d 485 [2007]; Matter of LaSalle v. New York State Div. of Parole, 30 A.D.3d 639, 640, 815 N.Y.S.2d 783 [2006] ).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 11, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)