Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Herbert JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Program, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate and a diabetic, was the subject of a misbehavior report charging that he refused to return a syringe taken from the prison infirmary. Petitioner was subsequently found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting refusal to obey a direct order and causing the loss of property. Petitioner contends that the determination of his guilt was not based upon substantial evidence. We disagree. Presented in evidence at the disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report and the testimony of the facility's nurse who stated that she gave petitioner a syringe so that he could administer his own insulin injection and that while she was distracted by a brief telephone call, petitioner left the room with the syringe which, although searched for, was never located. This was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139, 495 N.Y.S.2d 332, 485 N.E.2d 997). Petitioner's denial of the allegations in question simply presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)