Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jaime MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. GREAT MEADOW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was an inmate at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County when he was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits, inter alia, organizing, participating in or urging other inmates to participate in actions that might disrupt the order of the facility. Presented in evidence at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report charging that petitioner had instigated a demonstration on the anniversary of the Attica uprising, as evidenced by his yelling to a fellow inmate in the mess hall urging him to admonish other inmates not to eat breakfast as part of a facility-wide fast. The misbehavior report, written by a correction officer who was an eyewitness to the events in question, was sufficiently detailed and probative to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). That petitioner's testimony and that of his inmate witness was in conflict therewith presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, id.). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit or unpreserved for our review.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)