Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Efrain SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possession of marihuana and smuggling. The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that he had observed petitioner passing a white envelope to a second inmate. He then took the envelope from the second inmate and found therein a substance that subsequent laboratory testing disclosed to be marihuana. The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who wrote it based upon his eyewitness observations were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Maldonado v. Goord, 270 A.D.2d 742, 704 N.Y.S.2d 383; Matter of Alston v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 252 A.D.2d 697, 675 N.Y.S.2d 414). Petitioner's testimony and that of his inmate witness claiming his innocence of the charged misconduct presented an issue of credibility that the Hearing Officer was free to resolve against petitioner (see, Matter of Roman v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 519, 705 N.Y.S.2d 88; Matter of Davis v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 548, 704 N.Y.S.2d 677). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner's assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 03, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)