Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Karen Jacobs LAUDER, etc., respondent, v. Ingrid Andersson JACOBS, etc., defendant-appellant; Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund, nonparty-appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust over certain assets, (1) the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, S.), dated November 10, 2005, as, upon consolidating this action with a discovery proceeding between the same parties pending in the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County, directed her and the nonparties, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund and Merrill Lynch, to notify the plaintiff and the court in writing of individual withdrawals in excess of $2,500 and/or aggregate withdrawals in excess of $25,000 made by her from accounts maintained by Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund and Merrill Lynch, and (2) the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund separately appeals from so much of the same order as imposed the notification requirement upon it.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the Surrogate's Court did not impermissibly interfere with the defendant's use of the subject funds or improvidently exercise its broad discretion under the circumstances of this case by directing them to notify the plaintiff and the court of individual and/or aggregate withdrawals in certain amounts made by the defendant from the investment accounts which are at issue in this case (see generally SCPA 201 [3]; Matter of Stuart, 261 A.D.2d 550, 690 N.Y.S.2d 644).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 26, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)