Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James WEAVER, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting smuggling and the unauthorized possession of controlled substances. The charges arose out of a confidential investigation which disclosed that petitioner had been selling marihuana and heroin. Petitioner challenges the sufficiency of the evidence presented against him on the ground that no controlled substances were ever found in his possession. It is well settled, however, that substantial evidence may consist of confidential information relayed to the hearing officer so long as the officer has made an independent assessment to determine that the information is “reliable and credible” (Matter of Vega v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 807, 808, 712 N.Y.S.2d 78). Our review of the in camera material contained in the record before us discloses that the Hearing Officer independently assessed the reliability and credibility of the confidential information before relying upon it as evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Salahuddin v. Selsky, 293 A.D.2d 900, 742 N.Y.S.2d 134, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 614; Matter of Sheppard v. Goord, 292 A.D.2d 694, 695, 741 N.Y.S.2d 128). As substantial evidence in the form of this confidential information and the misbehavior report supports the determination of petitioner's guilt, it will not be disturbed. The remaining contentions raised herein have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 09, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)