Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jonah ALSTON, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered January 12, 2007, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was charged with committing seven different robberies. With respect to four of those robberies, witnesses testified that the masked perpetrator had robbed them at gunpoint, and placed all the money into a black bag. The People sought to admit evidence of an incident in which the unmasked defendant was caught at the scene of one of the robberies attempting to shoplift two cans of Red Bull energy drink, by placing the drinks into a black bag. The court allowed the testimony to be admitted and, upon his conviction of one of the seven robberies, the defendant appeals.
Although evidence of uncharged crimes is generally inadmissible, it can be admitted to establish, among other things, the defendant's identity (see People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 293, 61 N.E. 286, see also People v. Vails, 43 N.Y.2d 364, 368, 401 N.Y.S.2d 479, 372 N.E.2d 320). Here, the Supreme Court properly found that the evidence of the defendant's use of a black bag demonstrated a unique modus operandi and, therefore, was probative of his identity as the perpetrator of the robberies, and that the probative value of the evidence outweighed any prejudicial effect (see People v. Clink, 32 A.D.3d 862, 862-863, 821 N.Y.S.2d 613; People v. Gordon, 308 A.D.2d 461, 764 N.Y.S.2d 115; People v. Wandoloski, 128 A.D.2d 568, 512 N.Y.S.2d 504; cf. People v. Robinson, 68 N.Y.2d 541, 550, 510 N.Y.S.2d 837, 503 N.E.2d 485).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 12, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)