Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert MEYER, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the County Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, J.), entered September 18, 2007, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree and was ultimately sentenced to 5 1/313 to 16 years in prison. In connection with his release, County Court classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art. 6-C). Defendant now appeals.
Appellate counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the basis that an appeal would be frivolous. Upon our review of counsel's brief and the record, we disagree. During the sex offender classification hearing, defendant argued, among other things, that he was assessed too many points in two specific risk assessment categories and, consequently, his risk assessment score should be indicative of a risk level II sex offender. Without passing any judgment on the ultimate merit of those or any other potential issues, defense counsel's application to be relieved of his assignment is granted and new counsel will be assigned to address any issues that the record may disclose (see People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986]; see generally People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ).
ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 05, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)