Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jacinto CABRAL, Petitioner, v. GREAT MEADOW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was served with a misbehavior report alleging that he violated the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting possession of weapons after three makeshift weapons were found secreted in a leg of a bed in petitioner's cell during a suspicion-based cell frisk. Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt on several grounds, including his claim that such determination was not based upon substantial evidence. We disagree. In our view, the clear and detailed misbehavior report constitutes substantial evidence to support the alleged misconduct (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). Although petitioner denied that either he or his cell mate owned or hid the weapons, this merely presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to decide (see, Matter of Flowers v. Barkley, 244 A.D.2d 682, 683, 664 N.Y.S.2d 373). Thus, petitioner's assertion that he had no knowledge of the presence of the weapons concealed in the bunk “was insufficient to defeat the inference of possession that arises whenever a weapon is found in an area under an inmate's control” (Matter of Kennedy v. Coombe, 236 A.D.2d 726, 654 N.Y.S.2d 422; see, Matter of Fernandez v. Stinson, 251 A.D.2d 887, 675 N.Y.S.2d 911). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims of Hearing Officer bias and improper cell search and his challenge to the excessiveness of the penalty imposed, have been examined and, to the extent that they have been preserved for our review, found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 13, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)