Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Adam COSTANZA, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Miller, J.), rendered December 7, 2005, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of assault in the second degree.
ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.
On May 21, 2003, the defendant, having pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree, was sentenced to, inter alia, a period of probation which included as conditions thereof that he abstain from the use of illegal drugs or alcohol and submit to testing for these substances. In April 2005 the defendant was arrested in connection with a complaint of assault and unlawful imprisonment; at that time, he refused to submit to requested drug testing. After a hearing, the defendant was found to have violated the terms of his probation, and sentence was imposed on the original assault conviction.
Having considered the evidence of the defendant's mental illness as a factor (see People v. Recor, 87 N.Y.2d 933, 640 N.Y.S.2d 869, 663 N.E.2d 910), the court properly found that evidence of the defendant's mental illness did not establish his lack of capacity (see People v. Godfrey, 33 A.D.3d 623, 822 N.Y.S.2d 135; People v. LaGuerre, 29 A.D.3d 820, 815 N.Y.S.2d 211; People v. Phillips, 243 A.D.2d 514, 663 N.Y.S.2d 90). The court properly found that the defendant had violated the terms of his probation by a preponderance of the evidence (see CPL 410.70; People v. Murray, 12 A.D.3d 838, 784 N.Y.S.2d 674; People v. Cook, 295 A.D.2d 622, 745 N.Y.S.2d 182; People v. Costanza, 281 A.D.2d 120, 725 N.Y.S.2d 686).
Upon a finding that defendant has violated probation, the court is authorized to revoke probation and sentence defendant for the original crime (see CPL 470.10[5]; People v. Haas, 245 A.D.2d 825, 666 N.Y.S.2d 324). The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Miller, 185 A.D.2d 248, 586 N.Y.S.2d 145).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 23, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)