Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ramon GONZALEZ, appellant, v. James H. LAWRENCE, etc., respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, James H. Lawrence, Police Commissioner of Nassau County, dated September 6, 2005, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner's application for a pistol license, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated March 1, 2006, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
“A pistol licensing officer has broad discretion in ruling on permit applications and may deny an application for any good cause” (Matter of Orgel v. DiFiore, 303 A.D.2d 758, 756 N.Y.S.2d 870; see Penal Law § 400.00[1] [g]; Matter of Biganini v. Gallagher, 293 A.D.2d 603, 742 N.Y.S.2d 73). Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination denying his application was rationally based, supported by substantial evidence in the record, and neither arbitrary nor capricious (see Matter of Sarro v. Smith, 8 A.D.3d 395, 777 N.Y.S.2d 710; Matter of Orgel v. DiFiore, supra at 759, 756 N.Y.S.2d 870). His three arrests and failure, on a prior Nassau County application, to disclose the arrests and related revocation of his New York City pistol license were sufficient to support the respondent's determination (see Matter of Romanoff v. Kelly, 23 A.D.3d 212, 806 N.Y.S.2d 6; Matter of Hock v. Scarpino, 185 A.D.2d 237, 238, 586 N.Y.S.2d 15; Matter of Anderson v. Mogavero, 116 A.D.2d 885, 498 N.Y.S.2d 201). The fact that, on two of those occasions, the charges against the petitioner were adjourned in contemplation of dismissal and eventually dismissed does not disqualify the circumstances surrounding the arrests from consideration (see Matter of Peric v. New York City Police Dept., License Div., Rifle/Shotgun Section, 5 A.D.3d 142, 772 N.Y.S.2d 507).
Moreover, the petitioner's constitutional challenge to the licensing scheme is unfounded (see Bach v. Pataki, 408 F.3d 75, cert. denied 546 U.S. 1174, 126 S.Ct. 1341, 164 L.Ed.2d 56).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 23, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)