Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Leo A. MARINO, Appellant, v. Felix ROSA, as Director of the Executive Clemency Bureau, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sackett, J.), entered August 23, 2007 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.
On the same day that he made an identical request to the Governor (see Matter of Marino v. Pataki, 55 A.D.3d 1171, 867 N.Y.S.2d 219 [decided herewith] ), petitioner, an inmate at Collins Correctional Facility in Erie County, filed a request under the Freedom of Information Law (see Public Officers Law art. 6) (hereinafter FOIL) for any and all records related to his prior criminal case which were in the possession of respondent's office and used in connection with his clemency application. After receiving no response, petitioner commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging what he deemed to be a constructive denial of his FOIL request. Respondent thereafter moved to dismiss the petition. Supreme Court granted respondent's motion and dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.
We affirm. Pursuant to Executive Law § 15, the Governor is empowered to determine clemency applications. In his affidavit in support of the motion, respondent stated that the Executive Clemency Bureau serves as a “clearinghouse” for clemency applications, forwarding all records pertinent to such applications to the Governor as it is the Governor's office “that maintains the records used in clemency determinations.” Inasmuch as the documents used in connection with petitioner's clemency application were necessarily in the possession of the Governor, rather than respondent's office, at the time of petitioner's FOIL request, the petition was properly denied.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
PETERS, J.P.
ROSE, LAHTINEN, KANE and KAVANAGH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 30, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)