Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dawn LISA, appellant, v. Bella PASTOR, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated June 16, 1998, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment in the instant case. The defendants established a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the underlying accident (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 582 N.Y.S.2d 990, 591 N.E.2d 1176), thereby shifting the burden to the plaintiff to come forward with sufficient evidence that she sustained a serious injury (see, Licari v. Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 235, 455 N.Y.S.2d 570, 441 N.E.2d 1088; Lopez v. Senatore, 65 N.Y.2d 1017, 494 N.Y.S.2d 101, 484 N.E.2d 130).
With respect to the plaintiff's alleged back injuries, the affirmed report of her treating physician was insufficient to defeat the defendants' motion, as it was based upon an examination conducted more than three years prior to the defendants' summary judgment motion (see, Schultz v. Von Voight, 216 A.D.2d 451, 628 N.Y.S.2d 388, affd. 86 N.Y.2d 865, 635 N.Y.S.2d 167, 658 N.E.2d 1040; Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774, 575 N.Y.S.2d 102; Philpotts v. Petrovic, 160 A.D.2d 856, 857, 554 N.Y.S.2d 289). Additionally, the plaintiff's physician failed to indicate what, if any, objective tests he had performed in reaching his conclusion (see, Lincoln v. Johnson, 225 A.D.2d 593, 639 N.Y.S.2d 124; Giannakis v. Paschilidou, 212 A.D.2d 502, 622 N.Y.S.2d 112; Antoniou v. Duff, 204 A.D.2d 670, 612 N.Y.S.2d 430).
Furthermore, the plaintiff presented no evidence that she had suffered a “significant disfigurement” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see, Loiseau v. Maxwell, 256 A.D.2d 450, 682 N.Y.S.2d 74; Koppelmann v. Lepler, 135 A.D.2d 507, 522 N.Y.S.2d 12).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)