Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: LAMONT DALE M. (Anonymous). St. Vincent's Services, Inc., respondent; Cleo C. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother's parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), entered October 8, 2003, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, upon finding that she abandoned the subject child, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursement.
The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing proof that the mother abandoned the subject child during the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The mother did not visit or contact the child, or establish that she was unable to do so, and the petitioner did not prevent or discourage contact between the mother and the child during that period (see Social Services Law § 384-b[5]; Matter of Julius P., 63 N.Y.2d 477, 481, 483 N.Y.S.2d 175, 472 N.E.2d 1003; Matter of Lee P., 304 A.D.2d 760, 757 N.Y.S.2d 786). Furthermore, the Family Court properly concluded that it was in the child's best interests to terminate the mother's parental rights (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824; Matter of Leake & Watts Servs., 262 A.D.2d 644, 693 N.Y.S.2d 608; Matter of Maldrina R., 219 A.D.2d 723, 724, 631 N.Y.S.2d 742).
The mother's remaining contention is without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 12, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)