Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Larry KREBS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered May 13, 2002, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's request for a justification charge since no reasonable view of the evidence supported such a charge. The defendant stabbed the victim in the neck, when the victim was unarmed, and the defendant had no reason to believe that the victim was carrying a weapon or was about to use deadly physical force against him (see People v. Reynoso, 73 N.Y.2d 816, 818, 537 N.Y.S.2d 113, 534 N.E.2d 30; People v. Porter, 161 A.D.2d 811, 556 N.Y.S.2d 139; People v. Harris, 134 A.D.2d 369, 520 N.Y.S.2d 847; People v. Figueroa, 111 A.D.2d 765, 766, 490 N.Y.S.2d 24).
To the extent that the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is premised upon his attorney's alleged failure to properly advise him with respect to his right to testify at trial, such a claim involves matter which is dehors the record and not properly presented on direct appeal (see People v. Martin, 271 A.D.2d 459, 460, 706 N.Y.S.2d 892; People v. Boyd, 244 A.D.2d 497, 664 N.Y.S.2d 335; People v. Lebrun, 234 A.D.2d 392, 393, 651 N.Y.S.2d 544). The claim is otherwise without merit as the record establishes that trial counsel rendered meaningful representation to the defendant (see People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400; People v. Martin, supra at 460, 706 N.Y.S.2d 892; People v. Badia, 159 A.D.2d 577, 578, 552 N.Y.S.2d 439).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 25, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)