Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Mark FISH, Petitioner, v. John BURGE, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After two small wires that were concealed with glue were found running along the floor and into petitioner's prison cell, he was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of an item in a prohibited area, possession of an unauthorized item and misuse of state property. A tier II disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, authored by the correction officer who discovered the wires, is sufficient to provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Adams v. Goord, 45 A.D.3d 940, 940-941, 844 N.Y.S.2d 500 [2007] ). Further, the details of the misbehavior report were corroborated by the testimony of its author and the testimony of the other officer present when the wires were found. Petitioner's assertions that he was unaware that the wires were in his cell and that someone else placed them there created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Ubaldo v. Leclaire, 46 A.D.3d 975, 975, 846 N.Y.S.2d 781 [2007] ). To the extent preserved, petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the misbehavior report was defective and the confiscated wires were not properly secured and documented, have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 26, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)