Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matthew WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered October 8, 1997, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant New York City Housing Authority which was for summary judgment dismissing his cause of action based on General Municipal Law § 205-e insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Liability under General Municipal Law § 205-e is imposed upon a defendant when a plaintiff has made “the required showing that his injuries were practically and reasonably connected to [a] violation by the defendant” of a statute or code (Hoey v. Kuchler, 249 A.D.2d 365, 368, 671 N.Y.S.2d 487 ). The defendant New York City Housing Authority (hereinafter the Housing Authority) made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to come forward with evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the Housing Authority violated any statutory or code provisions or whether any alleged violation was the result of some neglect, omission, or culpable negligence on its part (see, McCullagh v. McJunkin, 240 A.D.2d 713, 659 N.Y.S.2d 309). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the Housing Authority which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's cause of action based on General Municipal Law § 205-e insofar as asserted against it.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 07, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)