Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: E. Paige PARSONS, a Suspended Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; E. Paige Parsons, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in and maintained a law office in Plattsburgh.
Respondent is currently suspended from practice because of her continuing failure to comply with a subpoena duces tecum obtained by petitioner in November 1997 in furtherance of its investigation of client complaints against her (Matter of Parsons, 248 A.D.2d 888, 670 N.Y.S.2d 261).
By petition filed in July 1998, petitioner preferred eight charges of professional misconduct against respondent. She has not answered or otherwise appeared in response to the petition or the subsequent default judgment motion, both of which were personally served upon her. Petitioner has submitted an affidavit factually supporting the charges of professional misconduct. Under such circumstances, respondent is deemed to have admitted the charges and the motion for a default judgment is granted (see, Matter of Petrolawicz, 228 A.D.2d 1005, 645 N.Y.S.2d 131).
Based on the papers submitted by petitioner, we find that respondent has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to complete client matters, kept unearned fees and billed the county for unearned fees, demonstrated an unacceptable disregard for the authority of petitioner and this court, failed to comply with the attorney registration requirements, failed to comply with this court's rule requiring her to reimburse petitioner for its stenographic costs (see, 22 NYCRR 806.4[e] ), and evinced a total disregard for her responsibilities as an attorney. In view of the above, we conclude that respondent should be disbarred (see, e.g., Matter of Clines, 216 A.D.2d 784, 628 N.Y.S.2d 848).
ORDERED that the motion for a default judgment is granted and respondent is found guilty of the professional misconduct charged and specified in the petition; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and she is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this court's rule (22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 31, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)