Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TOWN OF HUNTINGTON, petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and RPTL 1218 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Real Property Services, dated July 27, 2004, which established a special equalization rate of 0.76 for the 2004-2005 school year for that portion of the Cold Spring Harbor Central School District which is located in the Town of Huntington.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention the methodology used by the New York State Board of Real Property Services (hereinafter the State Board) in determining the special equalization rate was rational and the determination of the State Board to apply a special equalization rate of 0.76 for the 2004-2005 school year to that portion of the Cold Spring Harbor Central School District located within the Town of Huntington is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Town of Huntington v. New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs., 33 A.D.3d 620, 822 N.Y.S.2d 151 [decided herewith]; Matter of Town of Rye v. New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs., 5 A.D.3d 783, 785, 773 N.Y.S.2d 576; Matter of Town Bd. of Town of Cortlandt v. New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs., 282 A.D.2d 467, 722 N.Y.S.2d 742; Matter of Town of Wallkill v. New York State Board of Real Prop. Servs., 274 A.D.2d 856, 858, 711 N.Y.S.2d 228; Matter of Town of Greenburgh v. New York State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 226 A.D.2d 546, 641 N.Y.S.2d 91).
In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 03, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)