Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Herbert BURGESS, Petitioner, v. Michael McGINNIS, as Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from making false statements. The evidence presented at petitioner's disciplinary hearing included the misbehavior report which related that petitioner had written a letter of complaint to respondent Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, reporting that an inmate in a neighboring cell was cooking food. When the reporting correction officer investigated petitioner's complaint by searching the inmate's cell, he found no evidence of cooking or burning of any kind to support it, causing him to conclude that petitioner had fabricated the allegation so he could move to a different cell.
Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the detailed misbehavior report (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of Lawrence v. Edwards, 261 A.D.2d 404, 690 N.Y.S.2d 69). Although petitioner contends that the charge is unfounded, this assertion raises an issue of credibility which was resolved against petitioner in the discretion of the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615, 617, 499 N.Y.S.2d 659, 490 N.E.2d 526; Matter of Pabon v. Goord, 275 A.D.2d 824, 713 N.Y.S.2d 298). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 21, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)