Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lance Daniel JENKINS, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Cortland County (Campbell, J.), rendered June 15, 2006, which resentenced defendant following his conviction of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.
When this case was previously before us, we vacated defendant's sentence and remitted the matter to County Court for resentencing with the instruction that the court must conduct an inquiry regarding whether there was a legitimate basis for defendant's postplea arrests before it could impose a sentence greater than that contemplated by the plea agreement (29 A.D.3d 1177, 1178, 814 N.Y.S.2d 415 [2006] ). Upon remittal, the court held a hearing, after which it concluded that there was, indeed, a legitimate basis for two of defendant's arrests. As such, the court imposed an enhanced sentence of 4 1/212 years in prison followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals and we now affirm.
County Court conducted a hearing relative to defendant's postplea arrests wherein testimony was given by an alleged victim in one of the matters and an eyewitness in the other matter regarding circumstances underlying the arrests. Defendant was afforded the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses and make any statements that he deemed pertinent. Having reviewed the hearing transcript, we are satisfied that County Court complied with the mandates set forth in both People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, 594 N.Y.S.2d 683, 610 N.E.2d 356 [1993] and our prior decision (29 A.D.3d 1177, 814 N.Y.S.2d 415 [2006], supra ), and properly determined that there was a legitimate basis for the arrests. Accordingly, defendant's enhanced resentence will not be disturbed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
MERCURE, J.
CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, PETERS and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 24, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)