Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Johvanny HERRERA, respondent, v. Kelly O'NEILL, appellant.
In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered May 27, 2004, which, after a hearing, denied her petition to modify a prior order of the same court entered January 30, 2001, inter alia, prohibiting her from contacting the child.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination of visitation to a noncustodial parent is within the sound discretion of the hearing court, based upon the best interests of the child (see Matter of Kachelhofer v. Wasiak, 10 A.D.3d 366, 780 N.Y.S.2d 290; Jordan v. Jordan, 8 A.D.3d 444, 779 N.Y.S.2d 121). The hearing court's determination “depends to a great extent upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the assessments of the character, temperament, and sincerity of the parents” (Maloney v. Maloney, 208 A.D.2d 603, 617 N.Y.S.2d 190). Therefore, it should not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Kachelhofer v. Wasiak, supra ). In this case, the Family Court's finding has a sound and substantial basis in the record promoting the child's best interest.
In view of the extraordinary circumstances in this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother visitation (see Matter of Michael F. v. Cerise S., 224 A.D.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 65; Matter of St. Vincent's Servs. v. Jean H., 211 A.D.2d 799, 800, 621 N.Y.S.2d 664). The record establishes that the mother had recurring bouts of illicit drug use and alcoholism as recently as four months before the hearing. She repeatedly neglected and abandoned the child at issue in this case as well as her other children, which led to the termination of her parental rights as to one of those children. Moreover, she exhibited erratic behavior and conduct in court, which not only confirmed that visitation would be detrimental to the child, but also resulted in temporary removal of her newborn daughter.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 05, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)