Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael S. GRANT, Appellant, v. Dana L. GRANT, Respondent.
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Covello, J.), dated September 12, 2001, which, inter alia, awarded the wife temporary child support of $475 per week and an interim counsel fee of $25,000, and directed that he maintain medical and dental insurance for her and the parties' two children and pay all necessary unreimbursed medical expenses for the children.
ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision awarding the wife an interim counsel fee of $25,000; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Modifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made by an appellate court (see Verderame v. Verderame, 247 A.D.2d 609, 669 N.Y.S.2d 227). However, such an award may be modified when it is “so prohibitive that the payor spouse is prevented from meeting his or her own financial obligations” (Stanton v. Stanton, 211 A.D.2d 781, 621 N.Y.S.2d 676). Here, the Supreme Court's award of pendente lite child support to the wife should not be disturbed, as the husband did not demonstrate that the award left him unable to meet his own financial obligations. However, the award of an interim counsel fee of $25,000 to the wife must be vacated as, upon this record, the wife did not demonstrate that she lacked sufficient funds of her own to compensate counsel at this stage of the litigation.
The husband's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 25, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)