Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Barbara DINI, Appellant, v. IMPERIAL WORKWEAR SERVICES, INC., Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated February 26, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff alleged that she was injured after she tripped and stumbled over a “ridge” in a floor mat located in the front vestibule of the hospital where she worked. The defendant supplied the mat to the hospital pursuant to an oral agreement whereby the defendant would pick up dirty mats and replace them with clean mats on a weekly basis. The defendant did not have any responsibility for the maintenance or inspection of the hospital's premises. The plaintiff alleged that the ridge in the mat constituted a dangerous condition which was caused by the defendant's improper storage and placement of the mat.
While liability can be predicated upon a showing that the defendant created a dangerous condition upon the hospital's property (see Finley v. Weill, 264 A.D.2d 438, 693 N.Y.S.2d 854; Phillips v. Seril, 209 A.D.2d 496, 619 N.Y.S.2d 291), the defendant demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment by establishing that the record contained no evidence that the alleged ridge existed before the plaintiff's accident, or that it caused the alleged ridge.
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).
In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the issue of whether the alleged defect was trivial in nature.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 02, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)