Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Reginald J. MARIE, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered September 1, 2005 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in two misbehavior reports with violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting fighting, engaging in violent conduct, creating a disturbance, assaulting staff, refusing a direct order and refusing to be frisked. At the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, the Hearing Officer ordered that petitioner be removed because of his unruly conduct. The hearing continued in petitioner's absence and he was ultimately found guilty of all charges. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding alleging that his due process right to be present at the hearing had been violated. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.
We affirm. The record reveals that, at the start of the hearing, petitioner advised the Hearing Officer that he did not respect his authority. As the hearing progressed, petitioner became increasingly disruptive by speaking loudly and interrupting the Hearing Officer. Thus, in view of petitioner's argumentative and uncooperative behavior, we cannot say that the Hearing Officer's decision to remove him from the hearing was in error (see Matter of Raqiyb v. Goord, 24 A.D.3d 1013, 1013, 806 N.Y.S.2d 747 [2005]; Matter of Polanco v. Bennett, 6 A.D.3d 846, 846, 773 N.Y.S.2d 911 [2004]; Matter of Webb v. Goord, 269 A.D.2d 641, 642, 704 N.Y.S.2d 172 [2000] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
CARPINELLO, J.P.
ROSE, LAHTINEN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 16, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)