Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rose RUISI, et al., appellants, v. FRANK'S NURSERY AND CRAFTS, INC., respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered June 23, 1999, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
While walking in an aisle of the defendant's store, the injured plaintiff allegedly tripped on a plastic plaque which was a clearance item and allegedly part of a floor display of clearance merchandise. This action was thereafter commenced against the defendant, which successfully moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.
In order to establish a prima facie case of negligence, “the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant created the condition which caused the accident, or that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition” (Bykofsky v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, 210 A.D.2d 280, 281, 619 N.Y.S.2d 760). In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant established that its clearance merchandise was displayed on a platform, not on the floor, thereby establishing that it did not create the dangerous condition upon which the injured plaintiff tripped. In opposition, the plaintiffs offered only conclusory statements that the defendant must have placed the plaque in the pathway because it was there when she fell, which was insufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment (see, Bradish v. Tank Tech Corp., 216 A.D.2d 505, 628 N.Y.S.2d 807).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 01, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)