Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Henry JACKSON, Jr., appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Corso, J.), rendered November 12, 1996, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
In exchange for his plea, the defendant was promised that he would be placed in a Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (hereinafter TASC) drug treatment program. The defendant was advised that if he successfully completed the program, the current charges against him would be dismissed. Additionally, the defendant was warned that if he failed to complete the TASC program he would be sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of three to six years. When the defendant appeared for sentencing, however, it was revealed that the TASC program to which he was sent would not permit him to take Prozac for his pre-existing psychiatric condition, and as a result, he was terminated from the program without completing it. The defendant thereupon asked that he be allowed to withdraw his plea on the ground that the drug treatment program was not suitable for him. The County Court rejected the defendant's application, and proceeded to sentence the defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of three to six years.
While the decision to allow a defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty generally rests in the sound discretion of the trial court (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v. Brown, 251 A.D.2d 677, 675 N.Y.S.2d 555), it is well settled that a plea induced by an unfulfilled promise either must be vacated or the promise honored (see, People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 241, 360 N.Y.S.2d 623, 318 N.E.2d 784, cert. denied 419 U.S. 1122, 95 S.Ct. 806, 42 L.Ed.2d 822). Under the circumstances herein, the defendant did not truly receive the benefit of his plea agreement. Thus, the County Court should have allowed the defendant to withdraw his plea.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 01, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)