Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John BURKE, respondent, v. KREGER TRUCK RENTING CO., INC., et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated April 30, 1999, which granted the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff was injured when, while he was driving in the left lane of the Long Island Expressway, his vehicle was struck in the side by a truck owned by the defendant Kreger Truck Renting Co., Inc., and operated by the defendant Angel T. Garcia. The defendants' vehicle, which had been traveling in the center lane, veered into the left lane just as the plaintiff's car was passing. In opposition to the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, the defendants invoked the emergency doctrine defense, and asserted that a question of fact as to the plaintiff's comparative negligence precluded summary judgment. The defendants alleged that Garcia swerved into the plaintiff's lane of traffic to avoid hitting a truck which had suddenly stopped just ahead of his vehicle. The court granted the plaintiff's motion, finding that the defendants were not entitled to rely upon the emergency doctrine. We affirm.
The defendants cannot invoke the emergency doctrine, as Garcia created the emergency by failing to maintain a safe distance between his own vehicle and the truck ahead of him (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129[a]; Pappas v. Opitz, 262 A.D.2d 471, 692 N.Y.S.2d 127; Johnson v. Phillips, 261 A.D.2d 269, 271, 690 N.Y.S.2d 545). Furthermore, the defendants' comparative negligence theory was entirely speculative and unsupported by the record (see, Perez v. Brux Cab Corp., 251 A.D.2d 157, 160, 674 N.Y.S.2d 343; Wilke v. Price, 221 A.D.2d 846, 633 N.Y.S.2d 686). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly found that no triable issue of fact existed to preclude partial summary judgment for the plaintiff on the issue of the defendants' liability.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 22, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)