Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: David MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After a correction officer confiscated a soda can from his secured hospital room, petitioner struck the officer and became involved in a physical altercation. He was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff and interfering with an employee. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony presented at the hearing provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Abdul-Khaliq v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 872, 872, 822 N.Y.S.2d 742 [2006]; Matter of Green v. Goord, 26 A.D.3d 562, 563, 807 N.Y.S.2d 729 [2006] ). While petitioner denied assaulting the officer, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Wilson v. Goord, 23 A.D.3d 727, 803 N.Y.S.2d 311 [2005] ). Moreover, we find no merit to petitioner's claim that he was improperly denied the testimony of an inmate witness inasmuch as this witness executed a written refusal form sufficiently explaining his absence (see Matter of Hill v. Selsky, 19 A.D.3d 64, 66-67, 795 N.Y.S.2d 794 [2005]; Matter of Claudio v. Selsky, 4 A.D.3d 702, 703, 772 N.Y.S.2d 424 [2004] ). Finally, petitioner's claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance is not substantiated by the record and, in any event, there has been no showing that he was prejudiced (see Matter of White v. Selsky, 3 A.D.3d 762, 763, 770 N.Y.S.2d 811 [2004] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 31, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)