Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gerard DOMOND, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in lewd conduct and disobeying a direct order. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. Preliminarily, inasmuch as the petition challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the determination of guilt, a question of substantial evidence has been raised which justified the transfer of this matter to this Court (see Matter of Encarnacion v. Goord, 8 A.D.3d 843, 844, 778 N.Y.S.2d 552 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 607, 785 N.Y.S.2d 25, 818 N.E.2d 667 [2004] ). Turning to the merits, the misbehavior report, together with the hearing testimony from the facility nurse who was involved in the incident and authored the report, comprises substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Adams v. Selsky, 54 A.D.3d 477, 478, 862 N.Y.S.2d 648 [2008] ). Petitioner's remaining procedural contentions, including his claims that he was denied the right to present witness testimony and that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been examined and found to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 30, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)