Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Abraham FATTAKHOV, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 5, 2008, which dismissed claimant's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.
Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) issued a determination on March 27, 2006 which, among other things, disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause and charged him with a recoverable overpayment of $2,025. On November 23, 2007, the Department of Labor sent claimant a notice requesting him to remit the amount of the recoverable overpayment. In response, claimant filed a notice appealing the original determination, which was received by the Department on January 7, 2008. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissed the appeal because claimant failed to timely file it within 20 days of the ALJ's determination. Claimant appeals.
We affirm. Pursuant to Labor Law § 621(1), an appeal from an ALJ's decision must be taken within 20 days from the date it was mailed (see Matter of Bottex [Commissioner of Labor], 48 A.D.3d 855, 856, 851 N.Y.S.2d 283 [2008]; Matter of Moorer [Commissioner of Labor], 40 A.D.3d 1335, 836 N.Y.S.2d 373 [2007] ). Claimant here did not file his appeal until almost two years after receiving the decision. While he explained that he did not take an appeal sooner because he was upset, this did not constitute a reasonable excuse for his inaction (see Matter of Chadwick [Commissioner of Labor], 29 A.D.3d 1256, 1256-1257, 816 N.Y.S.2d 223 [2006] ). Accordingly, we need not address the underlying merits of the denial and decline to disturb the Board's decision (see Matter of Trinidad [Commissioner of Labor], 21 A.D.3d 1208, 1209, 801 N.Y.S.2d 108 [2005] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 30, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)